Upload results --

Received from Rafael A. Irizarry at 1239 on 050805:

• dilution.csv: 4955025 bytes

• hgu95.csv: 4883456 bytes

• hgu133.csv: 6315725 bytes

Method: dChip with PM-MM / dChipwMM

URL: http://www.dchip.org

Assessment results --

• Comparison report based on HGU95 SPIKE-IN and DILUTION studies [pdf]

• Simple assessment based on HGU95 SPIKE-IN and DILUTION studies [pdf]

• Complete assessment based on HGU95 SPIKE-IN data [pdf]

• Complete assessment based on HGU133 SPIKE-IN data [pdf]

• Results (with table1 score coordinate):
  1. [1] 0.4238986
  2. [2] 0.859783
  3. [3] 0.7314033
  4. [ ] 660
  5. [ ] 399
  6. [4] 0.8279085
  7. [5] 0.9147914
  8. [6] 0.6100463
  9. [ ] 0.0868874
  10. [ ] 0.09211838
  11. [ ] 0.09791963
  12. [7] 0.1178664
  13. [8] 872.8827
  14. [9] 12.80658
  15. [10] 3.105899
  16. [11] 0.8676358
  17. [12] 1.676209
  18. [ ] 0.04464286
  19. [ ] 0.04866071
  20. [ ] 0.05348214
  21. [13] 0.07361651
  22. [14] 842.1786
  23. [15] 4.178571
  24. [ ] 12626
  25. [ ] 12625

• Results2 (with table2 score coordinate):
  1. [5] 0.9147914
  2. [4] 0.6100463
  3. [ ] 0.0868874
  4. [ ] 0.09211838
  5. [ ] 0.09791963
  6. [ ] 0.1178664
  7. [ ] 872.8827
  8. [ ] 12.80658
  9. [ ] 3.105899
  10. [9] 0.8676358
  11. [10] 1.676209
  12. [ ] 0.04464286
  13. [ ] 0.04866071
  14. [ ] 0.05348214
  15. [ ] 0.07361651
  16. [ ] 842.1786
  17. [ ] 4.178571
  18. [2] 0.3779683
  19. [ ] 5.579097
  20. [3] 10.83299
  21. [11] 0.04192450
  22. [12] 0
  23. [13] 0
  24. [14] 0.03144338
  25. [ ] 0.2748809
  26. [1] 0.3246796
  27. [ ] 0.4110471
  28. [ ] 3.813840
  29. [6] 1.165480
  30. [7] 0.8721268
  31. [8] 0.3449
  32. [ ] 0.0849688
  33. [ ] 0.5989139
  34. [ ] 0.3813432
  35. [ ] 1.80495
  36. [ ] 0.5166402
  37. [ ] 1.040572
  38. [ ] 1.980863
  39. [ ] 1.320889
  40. [ ] 0.9344032
  41. [ ] 0.852915
  42. [ ] 0.8354664
  43. [ ] 0.6489335
  44. [ ] 0.5719878
  45. [ ] 0.4186972
  46. [ ] 0.2305994
  47. [ ] 0.1785672
  48. [ ] 12626

• Results2-133 (with table2 score coordinate):
  1. [5] 0.9833569
  2. [4] 0.6513253
  3. [ ] 0.09031339
  4. [ ] 0.09909297
  5. [ ] 0.1109803
  6. [ ] 0.3336582
  7. [ ] 527.011
  8. [ ] 34.99634
  9. [ ] 1.387393
  10. [9] 0.9853831
  11. [10] 1.165271
  12. [ ] 0.02989074
  13. [ ] 0.03224206
  14. [ ] 0.0393466
  15. [ ] 0.08866213
  16. [ ] 438.4286
  17. [ ] 13.80952
  18. [2] 0.2646612
  19. [ ] 1.385963
  20. [3] 9.611165
  21. [11] 0.07864215
  22. [12] 0
  23. [13] 0
  24. [14] 0.05898161
  25. [ ] 0.1674863
  26. [1] 0.2046215
  27. [ ] 0.2656461
  28. [ ] 1.922645
  29. [6] 1.293228
  30. [7] 0.7502912
  31. [8] 0.6880136
  32. [ ] 0.1580402
  33. [ ] 0.6638485
  34. [ ] 0.775105
  35. [ ] 0.2763482
  36. [ ] 0.946856
  37. [ ] 1.200212
  38. [ ] 1.227749
  39. [ ] 1.877343
  40. [ ] 1.042481
  41. [ ] 0.7582112
  42. [ ] 0.6958166
  43. [ ] 0.8150042
  44. [ ] 0.882109
  45. [ ] 0.9403279
  46. [ ] 0.697866
  47. [ ] 0.4225629
  48. [ ] 22155

• Log of assessment R-script [txt]