Received from mena mena at 1523 on 060316:

Method: dimo1.1 / dimo

Comparison report based on HGU95 SPIKE-IN study only [pdf]
Results (with table1 score coordinate):
1. [1] NA
2. [2] NA
3. [3] NA
4. [ ] NA
5. [ ] NA
6. [4] NA
7. [5] 0.5181552
8. [6] 0.7865681
9. [ ] 0.5875212
10. [ ] 0.6474608
11. [ ] 0.7099227
12. [7] 0.8454196
13. [8] 1.018519
14. [9] 10.96708
15. [10] 0.1488977
16. [11] 0.5132496
17. [12] 0.1825065
18. [ ] 0.3734727
19. [ ] 0.4188988
20. [ ] 0.4883929
21. [13] 0.6494329
22. [14] 0.6071429
23. [15] 1.142857
24. [ ] 12626
25. [ ] 0
Results2 (with table2 score coordinate):
1. [5] 0.5181552
2. [4] 0.7865681
3. [ ] 0.5875212
4. [ ] 0.6474608
5. [ ] 0.7099227
6. [ ] 0.8454196
7. [ ] 1.018519
8. [ ] 10.96708
9. [ ] 0.1488977
10. [9] 0.5132496
11. [10] 0.1825065
12. [ ] 0.3734727
13. [ ] 0.4188988
14. [ ] 0.4883929
15. [ ] 0.6494329
16. [ ] 0.6071429
17. [ ] 1.142857
18. [2] 0.08510971
19. [ ] 0.1987051
20. [3] 0.3780175
21. [11] 0.3716739
22. [12] 0.9367265
23. [13] 0.8202351
24. [14] 0.5117721
25. [ ] 0.04105837
26. [1] 0.04937789
27. [ ] 0.06289814
28. [ ] 0.1613597
29. [6] 0.1810178
30. [7] 0.6149208
31. [8] 0.5164974
32. [ ] 0.07586611
33. [ ] 0.3887778
34. [ ] 0.311787
35. [ ] 0.1404171
36. [ ] 0.1236346
37. [ ] 0.1543087
38. [ ] 0.2740130
39. [ ] 0.3917467
40. [ ] 0.5254607
41. [ ] 0.6212298
42. [ ] 0.6959688
43. [ ] 0.7025679
44. [ ] 0.6527376
45. [ ] 0.5943856
46. [ ] 0.4369906
47. [ ] 0.3826849
48. [ ] 12626
Log of assessment R-script [txt]