Upload results --

Received from Pan Du at 1031 on 071214:

• dilution.csv: 16127545 bytes

• hgu95.csv: 12763363 bytes

• hgu133.csv: 16097404 bytes

Method: Variance Stabilizaing + RMA / VST-RMA

Assessment results --

• Comparison report based on HGU95 SPIKE-IN and DILUTION studies [pdf]

• Simple assessment based on HGU95 SPIKE-IN and DILUTION studies [pdf]

• Complete assessment based on HGU95 SPIKE-IN data [pdf]

• Complete assessment based on HGU133 SPIKE-IN data [pdf]

• Results (with table1 score coordinate):
  1. [1] 0.04327263
  2. [2] 0.9957675
  3. [3] 0.9719239
  4. [ ] 1
  5. [ ] 0
  6. [4] 0.599928
  7. [5] 0.486336
  8. [6] 0.8034754
  9. [ ] 0.6197006
  10. [ ] 0.6661212
  11. [ ] 0.7248305
  12. [7] 0.849413
  13. [8] 0.1213992
  14. [9] 10.43004
  15. [10] 0.1171318
  16. [11] 0.4719067
  17. [12] 0.1487523
  18. [ ] 0.4511161
  19. [ ] 0.4938393
  20. [ ] 0.5537574
  21. [13] 0.6757015
  22. [14] 0.1071429
  23. [15] 1.107143
  24. [ ] 12626
  25. [ ] 12626

• Results2 (with table2 score coordinate):
  1. [5] 0.486336
  2. [4] 0.8034754
  3. [ ] 0.6197006
  4. [ ] 0.6661212
  5. [ ] 0.7248305
  6. [ ] 0.849413
  7. [ ] 0.1213992
  8. [ ] 10.43004
  9. [ ] 0.1171318
  10. [9] 0.4719067
  11. [10] 0.1487523
  12. [ ] 0.4511161
  13. [ ] 0.4938393
  14. [ ] 0.5537574
  15. [ ] 0.6757015
  16. [ ] 0.1071429
  17. [ ] 1.107143
  18. [2] 0.06663795
  19. [ ] 0.1526183
  20. [3] 0.2319480
  21. [11] 0.48569
  22. [12] 0.9495668
  23. [13] 0.8823484
  24. [14] 0.600987
  25. [ ] 0.0305681
  26. [1] 0.03751285
  27. [ ] 0.04818158
  28. [ ] 0.1242841
  29. [6] 0.1538586
  30. [7] 0.5659946
  31. [8] 0.4609499
  32. [ ] 0.0528144
  33. [ ] 0.3467057
  34. [ ] 0.3658827
  35. [ ] 0.0903829
  36. [ ] 0.1086705
  37. [ ] 0.1227865
  38. [ ] 0.2404760
  39. [ ] 0.3333264
  40. [ ] 0.4816153
  41. [ ] 0.5438497
  42. [ ] 0.6799004
  43. [ ] 0.6798115
  44. [ ] 0.6276365
  45. [ ] 0.5401023
  46. [ ] 0.3786163
  47. [ ] 0.2990351
  48. [ ] 12626

• Results2-133 (with table2 score coordinate):
  1. [5] 0.5472169
  2. [4] 0.8822227
  3. [ ] 0.5314992
  4. [ ] 0.5738673
  5. [ ] 0.6271461
  6. [ ] 0.786048
  7. [ ] 1.186813
  8. [ ] 29.91941
  9. [ ] 0.1604232
  10. [9] 0.5464436
  11. [10] 0.1716522
  12. [ ] 0.4279319
  13. [ ] 0.4596475
  14. [ ] 0.5115234
  15. [ ] 0.6489813
  16. [ ] 0.1904762
  17. [ ] 6.809524
  18. [2] 0.08974633
  19. [ ] 0.1873221
  20. [3] 0.2492372
  21. [11] 0.4647179
  22. [12] 0.927825
  23. [13] 0.9776573
  24. [14] 0.580993
  25. [ ] 0.04167411
  26. [1] 0.0475119
  27. [ ] 0.05481078
  28. [ ] 0.1009136
  29. [6] 0.1728738
  30. [7] 0.5901773
  31. [8] 0.771458
  32. [ ] 0.230793
  33. [ ] 0.5234147
  34. [ ] 0.6836323
  35. [ ] 0.07897906
  36. [ ] 0.05967716
  37. [ ] 0.07207395
  38. [ ] 0.2062627
  39. [ ] 0.3871868
  40. [ ] 0.4919505
  41. [ ] 0.5078521
  42. [ ] 0.5519575
  43. [ ] 0.723462
  44. [ ] 0.856363
  45. [ ] 0.9587754
  46. [ ] 0.7807905
  47. [ ] 0.5716971
  48. [ ] 22155

• Log of assessment R-script [txt]